Compare-Cities.com
Compare South San Francisco to Santa Paula
This post compares South San Francisco, California to Santa Paula, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South San Francisco (city) | Santa Paula (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 67,120 | 30,344 |
| Income (median) | $52,696 | $36,718 |
| Home Value (median) | $697,400 | $349,500 |
| White | 33% | 85% |
| Black | 2% | 0% |
| Asian | 39% | 1% |
| With Kids | 34% | 43% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 32 |
| Rentals | 38% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South San Francisco or Santa Paula?
A: South San Francisco has a larger population count than Santa Paula: 67120 compared with 30344 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South San Francisco or in Santa Paula?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in South San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South San Francisco or Santa Paula?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in South San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Santa Paula does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 38% for South San Francisco versus 45% for Santa Paula.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South San Francisco may include: Newark, Westminster, and West-Covina.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z