Compare-Cities.com
Compare South San Francisco to San Leandro
This post compares South San Francisco, California to San Leandro, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South San Francisco (city) | San Leandro (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 67,120 | 89,910 |
| Income (median) | $52,696 | $50,011 |
| Home Value (median) | $697,400 | $474,500 |
| White | 33% | 39% |
| Black | 2% | 11% |
| Asian | 39% | 33% |
| With Kids | 34% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 40 |
| Rentals | 38% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South San Francisco or San Leandro?
A: South San Francisco has a smaller population count than San Leandro: 67120 compared with 89910 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South San Francisco or in San Leandro?
A: Incomes are on average similar in South San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South San Francisco or San Leandro?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in South San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Leandro does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 38% for South San Francisco versus 45% for San Leandro.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South San Francisco may include: Newark, Westminster, and West-Covina.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z