Compare-Cities.com
Compare South San Francisco to San Fernando
This post compares South San Francisco, California to San Fernando, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South San Francisco (city) | San Fernando (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 67,120 | 24,581 |
| Income (median) | $52,696 | $37,371 |
| Home Value (median) | $697,400 | $370,300 |
| White | 33% | 57% |
| Black | 2% | 1% |
| Asian | 39% | 1% |
| With Kids | 34% | 49% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 33 |
| Rentals | 38% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South San Francisco or San Fernando?
A: South San Francisco has a larger population count than San Fernando: 67120 compared with 24581 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South San Francisco or in San Fernando?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in South San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South San Francisco or San Fernando?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in South San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Fernando does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for South San Francisco versus 45% for San Fernando.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South San Francisco may include: Newark, Westminster, and West-Covina.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z