Compare-Cities.com
Compare South San Francisco to Redwood City
This post compares South San Francisco, California to Redwood City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South San Francisco (city) | Redwood City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 67,120 | 84,368 |
| Income (median) | $52,696 | $70,131 |
| Home Value (median) | $697,400 | $1,016,700 |
| White | 33% | 60% |
| Black | 2% | 2% |
| Asian | 39% | 14% |
| With Kids | 34% | 32% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 37 |
| Rentals | 38% | 49% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South San Francisco or Redwood City?
A: South San Francisco has a similar population count than Redwood City: 67120 compared with 84368 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South San Francisco or in Redwood City?
A: Incomes are on average lower in South San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South San Francisco or Redwood City?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in South San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Redwood City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for South San Francisco versus 49% for Redwood City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South San Francisco may include: Newark, Westminster, and West-Covina.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z