Compare-Cities.com
Compare South San Francisco to Rancho Palos Verdes
This post compares South San Francisco, California to Rancho Palos Verdes, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South San Francisco (city) | Rancho Palos Verdes (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 67,120 | 42,463 |
| Income (median) | $52,696 | $100,478 |
| Home Value (median) | $697,400 | $1,051,000 |
| White | 33% | 60% |
| Black | 2% | 1% |
| Asian | 39% | 28% |
| With Kids | 34% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 49 |
| Rentals | 38% | 20% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South San Francisco or Rancho Palos Verdes?
A: South San Francisco has a larger population count than Rancho Palos Verdes: 67120 compared with 42463 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South San Francisco or in Rancho Palos Verdes?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in South San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South San Francisco or Rancho Palos Verdes?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in South San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for South San Francisco versus 20% for Rancho Palos Verdes.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South San Francisco may include: Newark, Westminster, and West-Covina.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z