Compare-Cities.com
Compare South San Francisco to Rancho Cucamonga
This post compares South San Francisco, California to Rancho Cucamonga, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South San Francisco (city) | Rancho Cucamonga (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 67,120 | 174,573 |
| Income (median) | $52,696 | $56,814 |
| Home Value (median) | $697,400 | $444,200 |
| White | 33% | 62% |
| Black | 2% | 9% |
| Asian | 39% | 13% |
| With Kids | 34% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 35 |
| Rentals | 38% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South San Francisco or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: South San Francisco has a much smaller population count than Rancho Cucamonga: 67120 compared with 174573 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South San Francisco or in Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Incomes are on average similar in South San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South San Francisco or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in South San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 38% for South San Francisco versus 38% for Rancho Cucamonga.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South San Francisco may include: Newark, Westminster, and West-Covina.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z