Compare-Cities.com
Compare South San Francisco to Porterville
This post compares South San Francisco, California to Porterville, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South San Francisco (city) | Porterville (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 67,120 | 58,782 |
| Income (median) | $52,696 | $36,312 |
| Home Value (median) | $697,400 | $163,100 |
| White | 33% | 77% |
| Black | 2% | 0% |
| Asian | 39% | 4% |
| With Kids | 34% | 48% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 30 |
| Rentals | 38% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South San Francisco or Porterville?
A: South San Francisco has a similar population count than Porterville: 67120 compared with 58782 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South San Francisco or in Porterville?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in South San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South San Francisco or Porterville?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in South San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Porterville does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for South San Francisco versus 46% for Porterville.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South San Francisco may include: Newark, Westminster, and West-Covina.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z