Compare-Cities.com
Compare South San Francisco to Pittsburg
This post compares South San Francisco, California to Pittsburg, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South San Francisco (city) | Pittsburg (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 67,120 | 69,449 |
| Income (median) | $52,696 | $46,928 |
| Home Value (median) | $697,400 | $324,500 |
| White | 33% | 33% |
| Black | 2% | 16% |
| Asian | 39% | 17% |
| With Kids | 34% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 35 |
| Rentals | 38% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South San Francisco or Pittsburg?
A: South San Francisco has a similar population count than Pittsburg: 67120 compared with 69449 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South San Francisco or in Pittsburg?
A: Incomes are on average higher in South San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South San Francisco or Pittsburg?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in South San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pittsburg does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 38% for South San Francisco versus 43% for Pittsburg.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South San Francisco may include: Newark, Westminster, and West-Covina.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z