Compare-Cities.com
Compare South San Francisco to Pasadena
This post compares South San Francisco, California to Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South San Francisco (city) | Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 67,120 | 141,231 |
| Income (median) | $52,696 | $59,401 |
| Home Value (median) | $697,400 | $689,700 |
| White | 33% | 53% |
| Black | 2% | 10% |
| Asian | 39% | 16% |
| With Kids | 34% | 25% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 37 |
| Rentals | 38% | 56% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South San Francisco or Pasadena?
A: South San Francisco has a much smaller population count than Pasadena: 67120 compared with 141231 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South San Francisco or in Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average lower in South San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South San Francisco or Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in South San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for South San Francisco versus 56% for Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South San Francisco may include: Newark, Westminster, and West-Covina.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z