Compare-Cities.com
Compare South San Francisco to Oxnard
This post compares South San Francisco, California to Oxnard, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South San Francisco (city) | Oxnard (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 67,120 | 206,732 |
| Income (median) | $52,696 | $35,675 |
| Home Value (median) | $697,400 | $390,000 |
| White | 33% | 75% |
| Black | 2% | 2% |
| Asian | 39% | 7% |
| With Kids | 34% | 49% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 31 |
| Rentals | 38% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South San Francisco or Oxnard?
A: South San Francisco has a much smaller population count than Oxnard: 67120 compared with 206732 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South San Francisco or in Oxnard?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in South San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South San Francisco or Oxnard?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in South San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Oxnard does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for South San Francisco versus 46% for Oxnard.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South San Francisco may include: Newark, Westminster, and West-Covina.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z