Compare-Cities.com
Compare South San Francisco to National City
This post compares South San Francisco, California to National City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South San Francisco (city) | National City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 67,120 | 60,715 |
| Income (median) | $52,696 | $30,943 |
| Home Value (median) | $697,400 | $345,400 |
| White | 33% | 61% |
| Black | 2% | 5% |
| Asian | 39% | 19% |
| With Kids | 34% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 32 |
| Rentals | 38% | 67% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South San Francisco or National City?
A: South San Francisco has a similar population count than National City: 67120 compared with 60715 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South San Francisco or in National City?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in South San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South San Francisco or National City?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in South San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: National City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for South San Francisco versus 67% for National City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South San Francisco may include: Newark, Westminster, and West-Covina.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z