Compare-Cities.com
Compare South San Francisco to Los Banos
This post compares South San Francisco, California to Los Banos, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South San Francisco (city) | Los Banos (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 67,120 | 37,559 |
| Income (median) | $52,696 | $41,562 |
| Home Value (median) | $697,400 | $226,700 |
| White | 33% | 65% |
| Black | 2% | 1% |
| Asian | 39% | 2% |
| With Kids | 34% | 49% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 30 |
| Rentals | 38% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South San Francisco or Los Banos?
A: South San Francisco has a larger population count than Los Banos: 67120 compared with 37559 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South San Francisco or in Los Banos?
A: Incomes are on average higher in South San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South San Francisco or Los Banos?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in South San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Los Banos does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for South San Francisco versus 45% for Los Banos.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South San Francisco may include: Newark, Westminster, and West-Covina.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z