Compare-Cities.com
Compare South San Francisco to Los Angeles
This post compares South San Francisco, California to Los Angeles, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South San Francisco (city) | Los Angeles (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 67,120 | 3,949,776 |
| Income (median) | $52,696 | $40,932 |
| Home Value (median) | $697,400 | $549,800 |
| White | 33% | 52% |
| Black | 2% | 8% |
| Asian | 39% | 11% |
| With Kids | 34% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 35 |
| Rentals | 38% | 63% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South San Francisco or Los Angeles?
A: South San Francisco has a much smaller population count than Los Angeles: 67120 compared with 3949776 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South San Francisco or in Los Angeles?
A: Incomes are on average higher in South San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South San Francisco or Los Angeles?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in South San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Los Angeles does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for South San Francisco versus 63% for Los Angeles.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South San Francisco may include: Newark, Westminster, and West-Covina.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z