Compare-Cities.com
Compare South San Francisco to Long Beach
This post compares South San Francisco, California to Long Beach, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South San Francisco (city) | Long Beach (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 67,120 | 470,489 |
| Income (median) | $52,696 | $46,054 |
| Home Value (median) | $697,400 | $476,400 |
| White | 33% | 52% |
| Black | 2% | 12% |
| Asian | 39% | 13% |
| With Kids | 34% | 32% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 34 |
| Rentals | 38% | 60% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South San Francisco or Long Beach?
A: South San Francisco has a much smaller population count than Long Beach: 67120 compared with 470489 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South San Francisco or in Long Beach?
A: Incomes are on average higher in South San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South San Francisco or Long Beach?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in South San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Long Beach does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for South San Francisco versus 60% for Long Beach.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South San Francisco may include: Newark, Westminster, and West-Covina.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z