Compare-Cities.com
Compare South San Francisco to Loma Linda
This post compares South San Francisco, California to Loma Linda, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South San Francisco (city) | Loma Linda (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 67,120 | 23,961 |
| Income (median) | $52,696 | $50,460 |
| Home Value (median) | $697,400 | $333,200 |
| White | 33% | 54% |
| Black | 2% | 12% |
| Asian | 39% | 25% |
| With Kids | 34% | 29% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 34 |
| Rentals | 38% | 64% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South San Francisco or Loma Linda?
A: South San Francisco has a larger population count than Loma Linda: 67120 compared with 23961 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South San Francisco or in Loma Linda?
A: Incomes are on average similar in South San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South San Francisco or Loma Linda?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in South San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Loma Linda does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for South San Francisco versus 64% for Loma Linda.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South San Francisco may include: Newark, Westminster, and West-Covina.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z