Compare-Cities.com
Compare South San Francisco to Livermore
This post compares South San Francisco, California to Livermore, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South San Francisco (city) | Livermore (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 67,120 | 88,232 |
| Income (median) | $52,696 | $75,750 |
| Home Value (median) | $697,400 | $643,200 |
| White | 33% | 78% |
| Black | 2% | 1% |
| Asian | 39% | 10% |
| With Kids | 34% | 36% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 39 |
| Rentals | 38% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South San Francisco or Livermore?
A: South San Francisco has a similar population count than Livermore: 67120 compared with 88232 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South San Francisco or in Livermore?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in South San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South San Francisco or Livermore?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in South San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for South San Francisco versus 28% for Livermore.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South San Francisco may include: Newark, Westminster, and West-Covina.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z