Compare-Cities.com
Compare South San Francisco to Laguna Niguel
This post compares South San Francisco, California to Laguna Niguel, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South San Francisco (city) | Laguna Niguel (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 67,120 | 65,429 |
| Income (median) | $52,696 | $76,498 |
| Home Value (median) | $697,400 | $737,400 |
| White | 33% | 75% |
| Black | 2% | 2% |
| Asian | 39% | 9% |
| With Kids | 34% | 29% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 44 |
| Rentals | 38% | 29% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South San Francisco or Laguna Niguel?
A: South San Francisco has a similar population count than Laguna Niguel: 67120 compared with 65429 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South San Francisco or in Laguna Niguel?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in South San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South San Francisco or Laguna Niguel?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in South San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for South San Francisco versus 29% for Laguna Niguel.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South San Francisco may include: Newark, Westminster, and West-Covina.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z