Compare-Cities.com
Compare South San Francisco to Laguna Beach
This post compares South San Francisco, California to Laguna Beach, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South San Francisco (city) | Laguna Beach (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 67,120 | 23,224 |
| Income (median) | $52,696 | $100,466 |
| Home Value (median) | $697,400 | $1,570,700 |
| White | 33% | 88% |
| Black | 2% | 0% |
| Asian | 39% | 4% |
| With Kids | 34% | 21% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 50 |
| Rentals | 38% | 37% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South San Francisco or Laguna Beach?
A: South San Francisco has a larger population count than Laguna Beach: 67120 compared with 23224 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South San Francisco or in Laguna Beach?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in South San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South San Francisco or Laguna Beach?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in South San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 38% for South San Francisco versus 37% for Laguna Beach.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South San Francisco may include: Newark, Westminster, and West-Covina.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z