Compare-Cities.com
Compare South San Francisco to La Caada Flintridge
This post compares South San Francisco, California to La Caada Flintridge, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South San Francisco (city) | La Caada Flintridge (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 67,120 | 20,474 |
| Income (median) | $52,696 | $104,688 |
| Home Value (median) | $697,400 | $1,280,900 |
| White | 33% | 62% |
| Black | 2% | 0% |
| Asian | 39% | 30% |
| With Kids | 34% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 43 |
| Rentals | 38% | 11% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South San Francisco or La Caada Flintridge?
A: South San Francisco has a larger population count than La Caada Flintridge: 67120 compared with 20474 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South San Francisco or in La Caada Flintridge?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in South San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South San Francisco or La Caada Flintridge?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in South San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for South San Francisco versus 11% for La Caada Flintridge.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South San Francisco may include: Newark, Westminster, and West-Covina.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z