Compare-Cities.com
Compare South San Francisco to Imperial Beach
This post compares South San Francisco, California to Imperial Beach, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South San Francisco (city) | Imperial Beach (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 67,120 | 27,270 |
| Income (median) | $52,696 | $39,262 |
| Home Value (median) | $697,400 | $433,400 |
| White | 33% | 71% |
| Black | 2% | 4% |
| Asian | 39% | 8% |
| With Kids | 34% | 37% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 31 |
| Rentals | 38% | 68% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South San Francisco or Imperial Beach?
A: South San Francisco has a larger population count than Imperial Beach: 67120 compared with 27270 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South San Francisco or in Imperial Beach?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in South San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South San Francisco or Imperial Beach?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in South San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Imperial Beach does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for South San Francisco versus 68% for Imperial Beach.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South San Francisco may include: Newark, Westminster, and West-Covina.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z