Compare-Cities.com
Compare South San Francisco to Foster City
This post compares South San Francisco, California to Foster City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South San Francisco (city) | Foster City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 67,120 | 33,529 |
| Income (median) | $52,696 | $105,889 |
| Home Value (median) | $697,400 | $1,051,000 |
| White | 33% | 43% |
| Black | 2% | 2% |
| Asian | 39% | 47% |
| With Kids | 34% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 40 |
| Rentals | 38% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South San Francisco or Foster City?
A: South San Francisco has a larger population count than Foster City: 67120 compared with 33529 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South San Francisco or in Foster City?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in South San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South San Francisco or Foster City?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in South San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foster City does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 38% for South San Francisco versus 41% for Foster City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South San Francisco may include: Newark, Westminster, and West-Covina.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z