Compare-Cities.com
Compare South San Francisco to Elk Grove
This post compares South San Francisco, California to Elk Grove, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South San Francisco (city) | Elk Grove (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 67,120 | 166,228 |
| Income (median) | $52,696 | $60,199 |
| Home Value (median) | $697,400 | $349,500 |
| White | 33% | 45% |
| Black | 2% | 11% |
| Asian | 39% | 28% |
| With Kids | 34% | 45% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 36 |
| Rentals | 38% | 27% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South San Francisco or Elk Grove?
A: South San Francisco has a much smaller population count than Elk Grove: 67120 compared with 166228 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South San Francisco or in Elk Grove?
A: Incomes are on average lower in South San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South San Francisco or Elk Grove?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in South San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for South San Francisco versus 27% for Elk Grove.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South San Francisco may include: Newark, Westminster, and West-Covina.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z