Compare-Cities.com
Compare South San Francisco to East Palo Alto
This post compares South San Francisco, California to East Palo Alto, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South San Francisco (city) | East Palo Alto (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 67,120 | 29,646 |
| Income (median) | $52,696 | $35,683 |
| Home Value (median) | $697,400 | $600,200 |
| White | 33% | 34% |
| Black | 2% | 11% |
| Asian | 39% | 3% |
| With Kids | 34% | 48% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 29 |
| Rentals | 38% | 64% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South San Francisco or East Palo Alto?
A: South San Francisco has a larger population count than East Palo Alto: 67120 compared with 29646 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South San Francisco or in East Palo Alto?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in South San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South San Francisco or East Palo Alto?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in South San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: East Palo Alto does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for South San Francisco versus 64% for East Palo Alto.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South San Francisco may include: Newark, Westminster, and West-Covina.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z