Compare-Cities.com
Compare South San Francisco to East Los Angeles
This post compares South San Francisco, California to East Los Angeles, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South San Francisco (city) | East Los Angeles (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 67,120 | 123,905 |
| Income (median) | $52,696 | $29,480 |
| Home Value (median) | $697,400 | $349,200 |
| White | 33% | 48% |
| Black | 2% | 0% |
| Asian | 39% | 1% |
| With Kids | 34% | 47% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 31 |
| Rentals | 38% | 67% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South San Francisco or East Los Angeles?
A: South San Francisco has a smaller population count than East Los Angeles: 67120 compared with 123905 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South San Francisco or in East Los Angeles?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in South San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South San Francisco or East Los Angeles?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in South San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: East Los Angeles does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for South San Francisco versus 67% for East Los Angeles.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South San Francisco may include: Newark, Westminster, and West-Covina.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z