Compare-Cities.com
Compare South San Francisco to Desert Hot Springs
This post compares South San Francisco, California to Desert Hot Springs, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South San Francisco (city) | Desert Hot Springs (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 67,120 | 28,298 |
| Income (median) | $52,696 | $32,379 |
| Home Value (median) | $697,400 | $154,600 |
| White | 33% | 70% |
| Black | 2% | 7% |
| Asian | 39% | 2% |
| With Kids | 34% | 40% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 34 |
| Rentals | 38% | 56% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South San Francisco or Desert Hot Springs?
A: South San Francisco has a larger population count than Desert Hot Springs: 67120 compared with 28298 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South San Francisco or in Desert Hot Springs?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in South San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South San Francisco or Desert Hot Springs?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in South San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Desert Hot Springs does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for South San Francisco versus 56% for Desert Hot Springs.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South San Francisco may include: Newark, Westminster, and West-Covina.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z