Compare-Cities.com
Compare South San Francisco to Dana Point
This post compares South San Francisco, California to Dana Point, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South San Francisco (city) | Dana Point (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 67,120 | 34,028 |
| Income (median) | $52,696 | $70,677 |
| Home Value (median) | $697,400 | $833,800 |
| White | 33% | 83% |
| Black | 2% | 1% |
| Asian | 39% | 3% |
| With Kids | 34% | 22% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 48 |
| Rentals | 38% | 39% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South San Francisco or Dana Point?
A: South San Francisco has a larger population count than Dana Point: 67120 compared with 34028 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South San Francisco or in Dana Point?
A: Incomes are on average lower in South San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South San Francisco or Dana Point?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in South San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Dana Point does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 38% for South San Francisco versus 39% for Dana Point.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South San Francisco may include: Newark, Westminster, and West-Covina.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z