Compare-Cities.com
Compare South San Francisco to Culver City
This post compares South San Francisco, California to Culver City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South San Francisco (city) | Culver City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 67,120 | 39,432 |
| Income (median) | $52,696 | $65,816 |
| Home Value (median) | $697,400 | $735,600 |
| White | 33% | 62% |
| Black | 2% | 7% |
| Asian | 39% | 15% |
| With Kids | 34% | 27% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 40 |
| Rentals | 38% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South San Francisco or Culver City?
A: South San Francisco has a larger population count than Culver City: 67120 compared with 39432 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South San Francisco or in Culver City?
A: Incomes are on average lower in South San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South San Francisco or Culver City?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in South San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Culver City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for South San Francisco versus 46% for Culver City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South San Francisco may include: Newark, Westminster, and West-Covina.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z