Compare-Cities.com
Compare South San Francisco to Costa Mesa
This post compares South San Francisco, California to Costa Mesa, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | South San Francisco (city) | Costa Mesa (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 67,120 | 112,930 |
Income (median) | $52,696 | $51,033 |
Home Value (median) | $697,400 | $671,800 |
White | 33% | 70% |
Black | 2% | 1% |
Asian | 39% | 8% |
With Kids | 34% | 30% |
Age (median) | 39 | 34 |
Rentals | 38% | 60% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South San Francisco or Costa Mesa?
A: South San Francisco has a smaller population count than Costa Mesa: 67120 compared with 112930 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South San Francisco or in Costa Mesa?
A: Incomes are on average similar in South San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South San Francisco or Costa Mesa?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in South San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Costa Mesa does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for South San Francisco versus 60% for Costa Mesa.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South San Francisco may include: Newark, Westminster, and West-Covina.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z