Compare-Cities.com
Compare South San Francisco to Concord
This post compares South San Francisco, California to Concord, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South San Francisco (city) | Concord (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 67,120 | 128,160 |
| Income (median) | $52,696 | $56,608 |
| Home Value (median) | $697,400 | $461,700 |
| White | 33% | 67% |
| Black | 2% | 3% |
| Asian | 39% | 11% |
| With Kids | 34% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 38 |
| Rentals | 38% | 40% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South San Francisco or Concord?
A: South San Francisco has a smaller population count than Concord: 67120 compared with 128160 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South San Francisco or in Concord?
A: Incomes are on average similar in South San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South San Francisco or Concord?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in South San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Concord does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 38% for South San Francisco versus 40% for Concord.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South San Francisco may include: Newark, Westminster, and West-Covina.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z