Compare-Cities.com
Compare South San Francisco to Chico
This post compares South San Francisco, California to Chico, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South San Francisco (city) | Chico (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 67,120 | 90,660 |
| Income (median) | $52,696 | $43,253 |
| Home Value (median) | $697,400 | $286,700 |
| White | 33% | 82% |
| Black | 2% | 2% |
| Asian | 39% | 4% |
| With Kids | 34% | 25% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 29 |
| Rentals | 38% | 55% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South San Francisco or Chico?
A: South San Francisco has a smaller population count than Chico: 67120 compared with 90660 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South San Francisco or in Chico?
A: Incomes are on average higher in South San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South San Francisco or Chico?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in South San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Chico does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for South San Francisco versus 55% for Chico.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South San Francisco may include: Newark, Westminster, and West-Covina.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z