Compare-Cities.com
Compare South San Francisco to Burbank
This post compares South San Francisco, California to Burbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South San Francisco (city) | Burbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 67,120 | 104,765 |
| Income (median) | $52,696 | $57,804 |
| Home Value (median) | $697,400 | $574,300 |
| White | 33% | 70% |
| Black | 2% | 2% |
| Asian | 39% | 11% |
| With Kids | 34% | 27% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 39 |
| Rentals | 38% | 57% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South San Francisco or Burbank?
A: South San Francisco has a smaller population count than Burbank: 67120 compared with 104765 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South San Francisco or in Burbank?
A: Incomes are on average similar in South San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South San Francisco or Burbank?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in South San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for South San Francisco versus 57% for Burbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South San Francisco may include: Newark, Westminster, and West-Covina.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z