Compare-Cities.com
Compare South San Francisco to Bell Gardens
This post compares South San Francisco, California to Bell Gardens, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South San Francisco (city) | Bell Gardens (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 67,120 | 42,845 |
| Income (median) | $52,696 | $25,604 |
| Home Value (median) | $697,400 | $347,300 |
| White | 33% | 79% |
| Black | 2% | 0% |
| Asian | 39% | 0% |
| With Kids | 34% | 61% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 28 |
| Rentals | 38% | 77% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South San Francisco or Bell Gardens?
A: South San Francisco has a larger population count than Bell Gardens: 67120 compared with 42845 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South San Francisco or in Bell Gardens?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in South San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South San Francisco or Bell Gardens?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in South San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Bell Gardens does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for South San Francisco versus 77% for Bell Gardens.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South San Francisco may include: Newark, Westminster, and West-Covina.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z