Compare-Cities.com
Compare South San Francisco to Baldwin Park
This post compares South San Francisco, California to Baldwin Park, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South San Francisco (city) | Baldwin Park (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 67,120 | 76,572 |
| Income (median) | $52,696 | $31,956 |
| Home Value (median) | $697,400 | $357,500 |
| White | 33% | 34% |
| Black | 2% | 2% |
| Asian | 39% | 18% |
| With Kids | 34% | 48% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 33 |
| Rentals | 38% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South San Francisco or Baldwin Park?
A: South San Francisco has a similar population count than Baldwin Park: 67120 compared with 76572 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South San Francisco or in Baldwin Park?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in South San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South San Francisco or Baldwin Park?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in South San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Baldwin Park does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 38% for South San Francisco versus 43% for Baldwin Park.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South San Francisco may include: Newark, Westminster, and West-Covina.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z