Compare-Cities.com
Compare South San Francisco to Bakersfield
This post compares South San Francisco, California to Bakersfield, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South San Francisco (city) | Bakersfield (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 67,120 | 372,680 |
| Income (median) | $52,696 | $44,447 |
| Home Value (median) | $697,400 | $228,400 |
| White | 33% | 68% |
| Black | 2% | 7% |
| Asian | 39% | 7% |
| With Kids | 34% | 45% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 30 |
| Rentals | 38% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South San Francisco or Bakersfield?
A: South San Francisco has a much smaller population count than Bakersfield: 67120 compared with 372680 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South San Francisco or in Bakersfield?
A: Incomes are on average higher in South San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South San Francisco or Bakersfield?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in South San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Bakersfield does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 38% for South San Francisco versus 43% for Bakersfield.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South San Francisco may include: Newark, Westminster, and West-Covina.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z