Compare-Cities.com
Compare South San Francisco to Arcadia
This post compares South San Francisco, California to Arcadia, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South San Francisco (city) | Arcadia (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 67,120 | 58,156 |
| Income (median) | $52,696 | $62,290 |
| Home Value (median) | $697,400 | $994,400 |
| White | 33% | 28% |
| Black | 2% | 1% |
| Asian | 39% | 61% |
| With Kids | 34% | 37% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 43 |
| Rentals | 38% | 39% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South San Francisco or Arcadia?
A: South San Francisco has a similar population count than Arcadia: 67120 compared with 58156 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South San Francisco or in Arcadia?
A: Incomes are on average lower in South San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South San Francisco or Arcadia?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in South San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Arcadia does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 38% for South San Francisco versus 39% for Arcadia.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South San Francisco may include: Newark, Westminster, and West-Covina.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z