Compare-Cities.com
Compare South Pasadena to Yucca Valley
This post compares South Pasadena, California to Yucca Valley, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South Pasadena (city) | Yucca Valley (town) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,974 | 21,483 |
| Income (median) | $74,034 | $47,320 |
| Home Value (median) | $928,500 | $160,500 |
| White | 54% | 80% |
| Black | 3% | 6% |
| Asian | 29% | 1% |
| With Kids | 34% | 29% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 42 |
| Rentals | 54% | 37% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South Pasadena or Yucca Valley?
A: South Pasadena has a similar population count than Yucca Valley: 25974 compared with 21483 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South Pasadena or in Yucca Valley?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in South Pasadena.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South Pasadena or Yucca Valley?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in South Pasadena.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 54% for South Pasadena versus 37% for Yucca Valley.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South Pasadena may include: San-Mateo, Alameda, and Campbell.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z