Compare-Cities.com
Compare South Pasadena to Temescal Valley
This post compares South Pasadena, California to Temescal Valley, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South Pasadena (city) | Temescal Valley (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,974 | 25,411 |
| Income (median) | $74,034 | $66,775 |
| Home Value (median) | $928,500 | $396,200 |
| White | 54% | 65% |
| Black | 3% | 7% |
| Asian | 29% | 8% |
| With Kids | 34% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 37 |
| Rentals | 54% | 14% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South Pasadena or Temescal Valley?
A: South Pasadena has a similar population count than Temescal Valley: 25974 compared with 25411 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South Pasadena or in Temescal Valley?
A: Incomes are on average higher in South Pasadena.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South Pasadena or Temescal Valley?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in South Pasadena.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 54% for South Pasadena versus 14% for Temescal Valley.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South Pasadena may include: San-Mateo, Alameda, and Campbell.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z