Compare-Cities.com
Compare South Pasadena to South Lake Tahoe
This post compares South Pasadena, California to South Lake Tahoe, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South Pasadena (city) | South Lake Tahoe (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,974 | 21,680 |
| Income (median) | $74,034 | $40,695 |
| Home Value (median) | $928,500 | $374,600 |
| White | 54% | 81% |
| Black | 3% | 1% |
| Asian | 29% | 3% |
| With Kids | 34% | 23% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 38 |
| Rentals | 54% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South Pasadena or South Lake Tahoe?
A: South Pasadena has a similar population count than South Lake Tahoe: 25974 compared with 21680 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South Pasadena or in South Lake Tahoe?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in South Pasadena.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South Pasadena or South Lake Tahoe?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in South Pasadena.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 54% for South Pasadena versus 54% for South Lake Tahoe.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South Pasadena may include: San-Mateo, Alameda, and Campbell.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z