Compare-Cities.com
Compare South Pasadena to Santa Rosa
This post compares South Pasadena, California to Santa Rosa, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | South Pasadena (city) | Santa Rosa (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 25,974 | 174,244 |
Income (median) | $74,034 | $48,146 |
Home Value (median) | $928,500 | $458,500 |
White | 54% | 68% |
Black | 3% | 2% |
Asian | 29% | 5% |
With Kids | 34% | 30% |
Age (median) | 40 | 38 |
Rentals | 54% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South Pasadena or Santa Rosa?
A: South Pasadena has a much smaller population count than Santa Rosa: 25974 compared with 174244 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South Pasadena or in Santa Rosa?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in South Pasadena.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South Pasadena or Santa Rosa?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in South Pasadena.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 54% for South Pasadena versus 46% for Santa Rosa.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South Pasadena may include: San-Mateo, Alameda, and Campbell.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z