Compare-Cities.com
Compare South Pasadena to San Clemente
This post compares South Pasadena, California to San Clemente, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | South Pasadena (city) | San Clemente (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 25,974 | 65,226 |
Income (median) | $74,034 | $77,045 |
Home Value (median) | $928,500 | $849,300 |
White | 54% | 81% |
Black | 3% | 0% |
Asian | 29% | 3% |
With Kids | 34% | 30% |
Age (median) | 40 | 43 |
Rentals | 54% | 34% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South Pasadena or San Clemente?
A: South Pasadena has a much smaller population count than San Clemente: 25974 compared with 65226 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South Pasadena or in San Clemente?
A: Incomes are on average similar in South Pasadena.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South Pasadena or San Clemente?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in South Pasadena.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 54% for South Pasadena versus 34% for San Clemente.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South Pasadena may include: San-Mateo, Alameda, and Campbell.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z