Compare-Cities.com
Compare South Pasadena to Pleasant Hill
This post compares South Pasadena, California to Pleasant Hill, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South Pasadena (city) | Pleasant Hill (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,974 | 34,662 |
| Income (median) | $74,034 | $77,000 |
| Home Value (median) | $928,500 | $633,400 |
| White | 54% | 75% |
| Black | 3% | 1% |
| Asian | 29% | 13% |
| With Kids | 34% | 29% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 39 |
| Rentals | 54% | 39% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South Pasadena or Pleasant Hill?
A: South Pasadena has a smaller population count than Pleasant Hill: 25974 compared with 34662 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South Pasadena or in Pleasant Hill?
A: Incomes are on average similar in South Pasadena.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South Pasadena or Pleasant Hill?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in South Pasadena.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 54% for South Pasadena versus 39% for Pleasant Hill.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South Pasadena may include: San-Mateo, Alameda, and Campbell.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z