Compare-Cities.com
Compare South Pasadena to Oakland
This post compares South Pasadena, California to Oakland, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South Pasadena (city) | Oakland (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,974 | 417,442 |
| Income (median) | $74,034 | $52,981 |
| Home Value (median) | $928,500 | $564,500 |
| White | 54% | 36% |
| Black | 3% | 24% |
| Asian | 29% | 15% |
| With Kids | 34% | 28% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 36 |
| Rentals | 54% | 60% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South Pasadena or Oakland?
A: South Pasadena has a much smaller population count than Oakland: 25974 compared with 417442 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South Pasadena or in Oakland?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in South Pasadena.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South Pasadena or Oakland?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in South Pasadena.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Oakland does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 54% for South Pasadena versus 60% for Oakland.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South Pasadena may include: San-Mateo, Alameda, and Campbell.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z