Compare-Cities.com
Compare South Pasadena to North Highlands
This post compares South Pasadena, California to North Highlands, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South Pasadena (city) | North Highlands (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,974 | 47,357 |
| Income (median) | $74,034 | $35,489 |
| Home Value (median) | $928,500 | $168,300 |
| White | 54% | 65% |
| Black | 3% | 13% |
| Asian | 29% | 6% |
| With Kids | 34% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 31 |
| Rentals | 54% | 57% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South Pasadena or North Highlands?
A: South Pasadena has a smaller population count than North Highlands: 25974 compared with 47357 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South Pasadena or in North Highlands?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in South Pasadena.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South Pasadena or North Highlands?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in South Pasadena.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: North Highlands does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 54% for South Pasadena versus 57% for North Highlands.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South Pasadena may include: San-Mateo, Alameda, and Campbell.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z