Compare-Cities.com
Compare South Pasadena to Loma Linda
This post compares South Pasadena, California to Loma Linda, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South Pasadena (city) | Loma Linda (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,974 | 23,961 |
| Income (median) | $74,034 | $50,460 |
| Home Value (median) | $928,500 | $333,200 |
| White | 54% | 54% |
| Black | 3% | 12% |
| Asian | 29% | 25% |
| With Kids | 34% | 29% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 34 |
| Rentals | 54% | 64% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South Pasadena or Loma Linda?
A: South Pasadena has a similar population count than Loma Linda: 25974 compared with 23961 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South Pasadena or in Loma Linda?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in South Pasadena.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South Pasadena or Loma Linda?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in South Pasadena.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Loma Linda does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 54% for South Pasadena versus 64% for Loma Linda.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South Pasadena may include: San-Mateo, Alameda, and Campbell.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z