Compare-Cities.com
Compare South Pasadena to Chico
This post compares South Pasadena, California to Chico, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South Pasadena (city) | Chico (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,974 | 90,660 |
| Income (median) | $74,034 | $43,253 |
| Home Value (median) | $928,500 | $286,700 |
| White | 54% | 82% |
| Black | 3% | 2% |
| Asian | 29% | 4% |
| With Kids | 34% | 25% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 29 |
| Rentals | 54% | 55% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South Pasadena or Chico?
A: South Pasadena has a much smaller population count than Chico: 25974 compared with 90660 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South Pasadena or in Chico?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in South Pasadena.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South Pasadena or Chico?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in South Pasadena.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Chico does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 54% for South Pasadena versus 55% for Chico.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South Pasadena may include: San-Mateo, Alameda, and Campbell.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z