Compare-Cities.com
Compare South Pasadena to Campbell
This post compares South Pasadena, California to Campbell, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South Pasadena (city) | Campbell (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,974 | 41,164 |
| Income (median) | $74,034 | $76,436 |
| Home Value (median) | $928,500 | $884,600 |
| White | 54% | 65% |
| Black | 3% | 3% |
| Asian | 29% | 18% |
| With Kids | 34% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 39 |
| Rentals | 54% | 50% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South Pasadena or Campbell?
A: South Pasadena has a smaller population count than Campbell: 25974 compared with 41164 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South Pasadena or in Campbell?
A: Incomes are on average similar in South Pasadena.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South Pasadena or Campbell?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in South Pasadena.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 54% for South Pasadena versus 50% for Campbell.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South Pasadena may include: San-Mateo, Alameda, and Campbell.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z