Compare-Cities.com
Compare South Lake Tahoe to South San Jose Hills
This post compares South Lake Tahoe, California to South San Jose Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South Lake Tahoe (city) | South San Jose Hills (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,680 | 20,423 |
| Income (median) | $40,695 | $31,494 |
| Home Value (median) | $374,600 | $322,800 |
| White | 81% | 36% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 3% | 10% |
| With Kids | 23% | 54% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 32 |
| Rentals | 54% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South Lake Tahoe or South San Jose Hills?
A: South Lake Tahoe has a similar population count than South San Jose Hills: 21680 compared with 20423 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South Lake Tahoe or in South San Jose Hills?
A: Incomes are on average higher in South Lake Tahoe.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South Lake Tahoe or South San Jose Hills?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in South Lake Tahoe.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Lake Tahoe does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 54% for South Lake Tahoe versus 28% for South San Jose Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South Lake Tahoe may include: Eureka, Redding, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z