Compare-Cities.com
Compare South Lake Tahoe to South San Francisco
This post compares South Lake Tahoe, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South Lake Tahoe (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,680 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $40,695 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $374,600 | $697,400 |
| White | 81% | 33% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 3% | 39% |
| With Kids | 23% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 39 |
| Rentals | 54% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South Lake Tahoe or South San Francisco?
A: South Lake Tahoe has a much smaller population count than South San Francisco: 21680 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South Lake Tahoe or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average lower in South Lake Tahoe.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South Lake Tahoe or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in South Lake Tahoe.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Lake Tahoe does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 54% for South Lake Tahoe versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South Lake Tahoe may include: Eureka, Redding, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z