Compare-Cities.com
Compare South Lake Tahoe to South Pasadena
This post compares South Lake Tahoe, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South Lake Tahoe (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,680 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $40,695 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $374,600 | $928,500 |
| White | 81% | 54% |
| Black | 1% | 3% |
| Asian | 3% | 29% |
| With Kids | 23% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 40 |
| Rentals | 54% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South Lake Tahoe or South Pasadena?
A: South Lake Tahoe has a similar population count than South Pasadena: 21680 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South Lake Tahoe or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in South Lake Tahoe.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South Lake Tahoe or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in South Lake Tahoe.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 54% for South Lake Tahoe versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South Lake Tahoe may include: Eureka, Redding, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z