Compare-Cities.com
Compare South Lake Tahoe to Santa Paula
This post compares South Lake Tahoe, California to Santa Paula, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South Lake Tahoe (city) | Santa Paula (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,680 | 30,344 |
| Income (median) | $40,695 | $36,718 |
| Home Value (median) | $374,600 | $349,500 |
| White | 81% | 85% |
| Black | 1% | 0% |
| Asian | 3% | 1% |
| With Kids | 23% | 43% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 32 |
| Rentals | 54% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South Lake Tahoe or Santa Paula?
A: South Lake Tahoe has a smaller population count than Santa Paula: 21680 compared with 30344 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South Lake Tahoe or in Santa Paula?
A: Incomes are on average higher in South Lake Tahoe.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South Lake Tahoe or Santa Paula?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in South Lake Tahoe.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Lake Tahoe does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 54% for South Lake Tahoe versus 45% for Santa Paula.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South Lake Tahoe may include: Eureka, Redding, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z